Thursday 14 August 2014

Media and 2014 Elections : Providing Clarity or Confusion




                Indians love a good story - one with humour, revenge, surprise, betrayal and suspense. Based on present media coverage, 2014 Lok Sabha Elections seem to have all the elements of a blockbuster movie in the making.

                It would be a revelation for firms and parties spending heavily this election season to know that the silent, resilient Indian voter gets irritated and turned off by paid coverage, confusing information and yellow journalism in the guise of ‘election specials’. But this revelation won’t bring in ad spends, TRPs and eyeballs that every media firm lives for.

                In its unbridled greed to get a bigger share of the pie from firms and political parties, the media is feeding the Indian voter an overdose of election porn and is in danger of being completely oblivious to the commercialization of an institutional process – elections. The principles of decency, fair play, sound judgement and objective, fact based, balanced reporting have been sacrificed on the altar of mammon. What else can explain the mad rush for fielding paid analysts, poll gurus; the endlessly insatiable drivel of ‘how’ India is going to vote, ‘who’ will come to power and the colourful profiling of candidates in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections?


                India’s election coverage season is a peculiar organism. It is cooked for the Indian voter by consummate opinion maker and chef extraordinaire, the Indian media. That this dish isn't exactly served to the taste and liking of the Indian voter is a story worth telling and repeating. Doing so would require our media to self-introspect and self-correct – two qualities so rarely found they might as well be extinct. Unless one happens to belong to a rarely seen species - the media watchdog, all is portrayed as well and vibrant in the big desi media family we read, hear and watch from.

                India’s electoral process and the politics surrounding it is now lurid entertainment that makes for gripping viewing. In the rush for TRPs, the serious task of vetting candidates and letting issue based politics take prominence has been given a miss.  Gossip about candidates and their personality is played up. Verbal volleys among candidates, party satraps & journalists have replaced soaps as primetime viewing. Scandal, filth and the most banal aspects of competing candidates have been listed and faithfully regurgitated as ‘breaking news’ with unswerving dedication in the guise of comprehensive coverage. The media has become kingmaker instead of becoming a voice for the Indian citizen.

The positive outcomes of the 2014 election coverage are that
a)      Media has played a key role in voter awareness by providing information on local, regional & national issues.
b)      The clarion call to go out and vote has been loud and clear this election season. The need to ‘make your vote count’ has been played up on TV, print, radio & online with the Election Commission leading from the forefront.


Whether the Indian media is providing clarity to the Indian voter on the choices he/she needs to make while electing candidates or simply serving confusion is debatable and defendable – based on which side of the media fence you are on. While media has indeed brought more awareness on the need to vote, too many cooks have spoiled the main dish - serving up unwanted, unnecessary information, adding clutter and chaos to an already shrill & polarizing election.


To sum it up, Indian media coverage of the 2014 Lok Sabha elections has been hijacked by commercial considerations rather than the practical need to present Indian voters with well balanced facts, analysis and objective reporting. Clarity has been sacrificed in favour of paid information doled out in tera-byte size servings of confusion; way beyond what the viewer or reader can rationally digest.

The biggest casualty is the Indian citizen who feels betrayed that the fourth estate is no longer striving to uphold solemn constitutional processes and has given in to a primal desire to promote what sells and what pays. Only a thorough judicial inspection and constitutional review of the Indian media’s rights and responsibilities to the nation will ensure that we get a fair deal. ‘Media kitchen cleanup underway’ makes for good headline copy!




(The above article was my submission on April 17th, 2014 for the Super Journo Contest conducted by St. Paul's Institute for Communication Education (SPICE) and has been therefore written in Indian / UK English. Any spelling variations are intentional and deliberate.)

Friday 7 March 2014

The Age of Excess : How Ratings, Data And Personal Information Are The New Frontiers In A Wild World


We live in an age of excess - excess of news, excess of information, an excess of expert advice, excess of ads, an excess of media driven consumerism, an excess of pretty much everything!

It is therefore human nature to jump to shortcuts while navigating this highway ridden with minefields of excesses. We look at the synopsis of an article, the cover page of a book, the review of a movie or eating outlet to jump to quick, easy and definite conclusions.

What fascinates me is how quick we are to give information to things that we agree with - via reviews, ratings or any survey / form that simplifies information and is presented in a format that we understand.

Imagine a scenario where you searched for the bride/groom of your choice. Would a synopsis, rating or review of the said person interest you? Would companies that rate / market / review you as a person and com-modify you as another item of consumption offend you? Would institutions that rate your marital harmony and your ability as a parent or care-giver be acceptable to you? Would a group that decides how every person on planet Earth must be rated and reviewed scare the living daylights out of you?

All of this is not science fiction or wishful thinking anymore. There are teams of people and organizations doing research based on mining data from all sorts of databases and social networks that you and I may be a part of. These social scientists, data miners or researchers (call them what you want) work for various organizations on various specified and unspecified activities, tasks and goals.

Some of these activities are overt and well-known but much of the work undertaken is covert. It is away from the eyes of the general public, away from the drumbeats of popular media and safely ensconced under the watchful eye of private organizations, defense establishments and snooping agencies.

If you are already spooked by reading all of this, my apologies.
That is not my intention. However, let me tell you what I intend for you to know. 

You need to be aware of the existence of technology that can hunt and scrutinize personal information and assemble a 360 degree profile of everything a person does, eats, watches, spends or buys. This could be his/her daily activity at work, at home, school, on-line, at the market or at any place where a commercial transaction takes place.

Many of you have read or might have known about Edward Snowden. This post does not seek to elaborate the hows or whys of what he did. But it does focus on an activity relevant to this blog post.

Data mining of Information & 360 Degree Profiling.

In short, Edward Snowden knew he was going to offend a lot of people in high places when he blew the whistle on the NSA's data collection activities. Why did people get so riled up with data collection for intelligence purposes? Isn't that a noble activity conducted by all governments for the safety and well being of their nation and their citizens? 

What was unique was that this was no longer an activity where a select few individuals who were suspect were targeted. This was a net that was cast out wide, across countries, populations, diverse races and ethnicity. The agenda was no longer to narrow down on 'rogue' characters or people who could be troublemakers. It was to maintain data on each and every person! If you think that's scary, it is!

The NSA is not the only organization involved in such activities. There are many other organizations - some which are deeply secretive and some which are run by highly influential and wealthy private groups.

While not all of these organizations may have state / government sanction for their actions, what is interesting is that ALL of these are interested in you and me - how we live our life, what we eat, what we talk, what we wear, what we spend, who we hang out with, who we befriend, who we associate with, who we give our money, where we spend our time and what we do for a living.

You would ask why?

Why not?

These organizations know that real wealth is in information. Information is power.
Let me repeat that - "Information is POWER".

It's no longer just enough for them to control wealth through the control of oil, trade, gold, currency and natural resources. Today it is information that drives the engines of organizations and economies.

So the rat race for supremacy in the information stakes has already begun. It began several decades ago. What we are now seeing is the race heading into the final laps.

 For example, do you think Facebook would give 19 billion dollars just for free chatting software that sits on practically one third of the mobile phones in the world? 

Absolutely not!

Facebook paid Whatsapp for the number of subscribers it has and for the information that it gets when it connects with Whatsapp's private and personal information database - millions and millions of phone numbers with information on every detail, picture, discussion, chat they have ever had on Whatsapp.
I can see Facebook's scientists and data mining teams rubbbing their hands in glee. And the NSA beaming with joy!

You might say that's not possible due to data security and confidentiality laws. But would you ever come to know if they broke the law? Would you know what exactly is being shared, what kind of information is being processed or analyzed and handed over to which organization under what pretext - national security, criminology, population studies, heuristics, social data studies, research etc. etc...

No, you wouldn't. That is why organizations are behaving like it is the Wild West all over again. Like in the horse & wagon races for potential landowners at a time when unexplored parts and vast hinterlands of the US were over-run by new settlers and new migrants from Europe, today it is all about who can run the fastest, use the maximum resources to capture the maximum possible information. 

Though land has not lost its value or glimmer even today, the new owners and elite are the ones who control personal information - the dissemination, the manipulation, the supply and the use of personal information according to their own set of rules bypassing every safeguard to privacy and freedom of a person.

It is therefore no longer wishful thinking to state that there are active programs seeking to quantify human experiences such as love, family, marriage, courtship, interpersonal relationships and put a price tag to information catering to these spheres of human interaction. 

The Bible talks of an age that will be prevalent in the time to come where no person will be able to eat, buy, sell, spend, live, interact, transact or communicate without a certain mark on the forehead. Micro-chip technology that embeds personal information and RFID tags are already used and present worldwide across a host of applications and industries. We may be closer to an unveiling of data collection of personal information using laser technology or some other format to mark each individual as a unique number or identity. 

Imagine an ID card at a global level that helps you bypass visa, embassy and passport restrictions and helps you travel swiftly and be across many places with the least hassle. Strangely this reason and many more reasons could be offered to an uninformed and gullible public in the years ahead. Technology to map each person is already in place. Many organizations have tried embedding micro chips that are the size of a grain of rice into the forehands, palms and wrists of volunteers in trials over the last several years. It won't take a great leap of technological expertise to perfect doing this on each person's forehead!

We are surrounded by wearable technology - whether it is Google Glass, sensors in clothes, clothes that change colour based on heat, clothes that are anti-bacterial or clothes that have information pods and sensors that communicate intelligently with other devices via WiFi, infrared, radio signals etc.
Soon we will be able to communicate effectively without having to open our mouths. Technology is already in place for a 'handshake' that communicates all information between one person to another and is being used in many places by business professionals and researchers who are too 'busy' to talk but still want to network with other peers at conferences, seminars & common platforms to meet up and do business with.

Many skeptics who used to dismiss the prophesies in Revelation as an exaggeration or ancient myth are now delving deeply into how they correlate to the happenings around us and give a spiritual perspective into the unrelenting march of organizations who are collecting greater amounts of personal information in order to search, profile, rate and review every activity, object, person and thing on planet Earth with each passing day.

If you have never read the Bible before, I urge you to start reading it today. Start from any book you want to. But if you want to see for yourself what I'm talking about in this blog post, you can start reading from the last book of the Bible - the book of Revelations.

Why wait? You can read it right away, right now! Some options for your reading comfort are as follows (all are free) 

You can just click on the links below :



Wednesday 5 March 2014

Barry's 3 minute Conversation with Putin



To news agencies and liberal media moaning that Romney and Sarah Palin were "right" about Russia: too late for the mourning!

The same media ripped them apart in 2012 just to get their favorite son Obama back to power. Now anything Obama says is pretty much irrelevant to Americans and the world at large considering his atrocious track record.


It's quite funny that Obama challenged Putin on the Ukraine issue saying that he would be seen on the 'wrong side' of history. As if Putin cares there is a wrong side to history!


Then the White House issues a statement with a picture of Obama standing next to his chair and talking on the phone to Putin. They say he was on call with Putin for 90 minutes. What they left out was that he was on hold for 87 minutes.


The conversation pretty much went like this -


Obama : Vladimir, Barry here.


Putin: Okay.


Obama : You can't do that in Ukraine.


Putin : Okay?


Obama : If I had a son, he would be Ukrainian.


Putin : Okay!


Obama : You're not taking this seriously.


Putin : Okay (yawns)


Obama : Do you want to be on the wrong side of history?


Putin : Wait let me change to History channel. My dog Sputnik messes up the remote and I don't get that channel sometimes. U like "House Of Cards" eh. I hear you sit and watch hours and hours of it at one time. Netflix should be happy, eh?


Obama : Oh yeah, I forgot to set it on record. I can't wait to see the latest episodes. Gotta run. Buh bye!


Putin : Okay!


Obama : I hope this matter is resolved and I can get back to playing golf. My golfing buddies are cribbing I left them dry and hanging over the last 2 days. Some silly National Security Meetings that I had to attend. But you know me, I tricked them into saying I was unwell and saw "House of Cards" all day, hee hee.


Putin : Dasvidanya. (In the background, voice says, "General, can we attack Ukraine now? It's time Russia got back all its states."


Putin (mumbles in Russian) : Niyet, niyet. (no, no)


Obama : I heard that too. Okay bye, 3 minutes is the longest I spent on the phone. Wonderful talking to you. You must visit the White House after you finish whatever you're doing. And also, if you have to attack Ukraine, leave all the animals alone. These animal rights and green activists who fund my wife's exercise drills will be offended. Sheesh. I forgot, House of Cards is on.


Putin : Okay. (Mutters to the voice next to him in a very low tone) "Pravda, prepare for war, I am feeling hungry for a Ukrainian burger today."


Phone clicks.




Wednesday 18 September 2013

The Genesis of Thought - My first post!



The Genesis of Thought



What brings us consciousness? What makes us think? What registers as thought?

Thinking of these questions brought me to the first post on my blog.

Welcome to a series of conversations between me and my thoughts shared with a wider audience. As you choose to be a part of it, I choose to welcome you.  Hope I am enriched by your thoughts as well.

And now, back to the questions.


What brings us consciousness?


Beyond the answers given by medical science and biological processes, there exists a complex dimension where research has not delved into. Can consciousness be researched? Wouldn't the mere thought of being researched / being under study alert a subject? So rather than looking at it from a research point of view or even biological, I look at it as a map – a LARGE map.

Suppose a man is on a journey. He needs to travel from Point A to Point B. You would say that he would plan his way and take one of the several possible alternatives / routes to commute and reach his destination. You would be right. Before he does any of that, he thinks about travelling. And his brain triggers impulses / thought patterns which replicate the journey, the alternatives, the means to travel and the decision he must make. So the journey started in the mind. The man had a mental framework in his mind. We can call it a mental map.

Imagine if we had a visible mental map for all our decisions made every day, every hour, every minute, every second. How would that map look like?

‘Complex’ ‘Interwoven’ ‘Interconnected’ ‘Vast’ these may be some of the terms you could think of.
So if the mere act of deciding/ decision making is like a series of maps, how would one view consciousness, the feeling of being alert and aware of surroundings and oneself?

It wouldn't be wrong to compare this feeling of consciousness to a super information system of complex layers of maps, each layer further interconnected with various triggers inside and outside the human mind. You could term it as a supercomputer of MAPS. Each location corresponds to a given value. Each point is relative to the other. Each point is interconnected and accessible. Each point forms part of a huge chain.

So consciousness can be described as a huge neural map that corresponds to all our actions that signify being present, being active, being wakeful as opposed to being mentally absent, being inactive or being sleepy.


What makes us think?


A fascinating question that I try not to think too much about! But will attempt to link with my thoughts on it.

The genesis of thought is what makes us human. We have been blessed with the faculty of thinking which we employ to good use in our daily life for various purposes. Some say we are human, so we think. Others say we think, therefore we are human.

I would like to state that the process of the origin of thought is an involuntary process, not something actively forced upon. Even when we like to think that we are not thinking about a particular thing or believe that our mind is blank, it is still occupied with activity that is running in the background and not evident enough for us to remember / consider. We can however recollect thinking certain thoughts; reflect on memories and bring back thoughts, even consciously and selectively choose to think certain thoughts over other thoughts.

So we know we can choose to think. But then what makes us think? Is it an external trigger that causes it or an internal inbuilt mechanism?  What causes us to believe we are thinking? Is it simply because certain areas of the brain light up during scans to show cognition and perception is at work along with language and speech processing or is there a more complex network out there?

Like the maps we discussed for consciousness, perhaps. I suppose that we have a hard coded instruction that triggers thought. The birth of thought is prevalent from the time a human baby is conceived and born. But science cannot understand/ measure an unborn baby’s thought patterns, so it effectively dismisses it by saying that the baby’s brains are not functional being an embryo / foetus and hence not fully active. But what if the genesis of thought were hard-coded inside us right from the time of conception! And like the journey from Point A to Point B, the hard-coded pattern inside us would cause us to develop and grow. Something has to trigger the growth of cells beyond just cell division and multiplication and beyond just the DNA map that every human has.

I call this the hard coding of thought – thought as a process that is essential to human survival from conception.  Thinking defines human beings and differentiates them from the larger animal population. The genesis of thought must therefore exist at the basic level of information coding. It’s something that is transmitted from parent to offspring. The DNA must be the key that opens it / activates it during conception. While science continues to delve deeper into understanding human minds and how they work, I propose that the genesis of thought is hard-coded. Since it is essential for a human being to mature in thought processes to be a fully active adult, it is not hard to understand that passing this crucial piece of information through genetic material would be part of reproductive efforts and an important aspect in conception and growth of a new life. 

Like a processing chip that is already manufactured to a preset specification, our ability to understand thoughts, process them, voice them, store them, link and connect them to events, occurrences and time is predetermined and hard coded in us. Maybe this explains why some children do not reach milestones of development in thought and information processing and some adults lag behind in cognitive processes. Is it similar to a defective chip among thousands of chips being manufactured? Or does it mean that certain chips were manufactured properly but the instructions were not properly encoded and hence caused them to malfunction?


What registers as thought?


You might say anything and everything. You are right. Anything and everything we think of, registers as thought. The mind maps it as a series of ideas, sequence of words, patterns, concepts, schematic and even visual representations in many dimensions. External stimuli bring in information and our brain processes them at various levels. Thoughts may be formed due to various triggers. It would be fascinating to know how we actually segregate thoughts from the data and mental maps swirling in our mind. The process of deciding what constitutes thought is equally captivating and open to interpretation.


And now, my brain has decided to signal my mind that it needs a break. So I think this post comes to an end. Since my thoughts gave form to this blog post, I hope to hear your thoughts from you as well. Hope you enjoyed thinking on these lines as much as I did!